Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:24
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Why was Nietzsche against essentialism?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Isn't it a turn on to have sex with a girl in a skirt or in a tight spandex?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
17 more Rite Aid stores to close in WA, including 4 Bartell Drugs - The Seattle Times
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
An Early Warning Sign of Dementia Risk May Be Keeping You Up at Night, Study Says - ScienceAlert
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
DL Coach Kris Kocurek Explains why 49ers Traded for Bryce Huff - Sports Illustrated
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.